Penalaran kasus dalam artikel "How evidence-based workforce planning in Australia is informing policy development in the retention and distribution of the health workforce"
Ciri kasus
|
Kondisi Nasional
|
Proyeksi HWA
|
1. Sumber tenaga kerja
|
Tergantung pada perekrutan internasional
|
Bisa diambil dari lulusan institusi kesehatan, dan dari tenaga kerja yang mengikuti pelatihan kesehatan
|
2. Fokus perencanaan tenaga kesehatan
|
Karena populasi di Australia didominasi oleh lansia maka pelayanan kesehatan usia lanjut lebih diutamakan
|
Dokter,perawat, dan bidan juga akan dibutuhkan masyarakat Australia dimasa mendatang
|
3. Ketersediaan tenaga kerja kesehatan dimasa datang
|
Mengikuti perkembangan penyediaan tenaga kerja internasional
|
Mempertimbangkan penyediaan tenaga kerja sendiri
|
4. Koordinasi dengan pihak terkait
|
Pemerintah tidak melibatkan sector sector yang berkaitan dengan kesehatan
|
Berusaha menjalin kerjasama antara pemerintah dengan institusi pendidikan kesehatan
|
A. Daftar referensi artikel:
1. Buchan J, Naccarella L, Brooks P: Is health workforce sustainability in Australia and New Zealand a realistic policy goal? Aust Health Rev 2011, 35:152–155.
2. Hernandez P, Dräger S, Evans DB, Tan-Torres Edejer T, Dal Poz MR: Measuring Expenditure for the Health Workforce: Evidence and Challenges. Geneva: WHO; 2006.
3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Australian Hospital Statistics 2009– 10. Health services series no. 40. Cat. No. HSE 107. Canberra: AIHW; 2011.
4. Goss J: Projection of Australian Health Care Expenditure by Disease, 2003–2033. Cat. No. HWF 36. Canberra: AIHW; 2008.
5. Australian Medical Workforce Advisory Committee: Medical workforce planning in Australia. Aust Health Rev 2000, 23:8–26.
6. Ono T, Lafortune G, Schoenstein M: Health workforce planning in OECD countries: a review of 26 projection models from 18 countries. In OECD Health Working Papers, No. 62. France: OECD Publishing; 2013:8–11.
7. National Health Workforce Planning and Research Collaboration: Alternative Approaches to Health Workforce Planning Final Report. Adelaide: HWA; 2011.
8. McCarty MV, Fenech BJ: Towards best practice in national health workforce planning. MJA 2012, 1(Suppl 3):10–13.
9. World Health Organization: Models and Tools for Health Workforce Planning and Projections. Human Resources for Health Observer, 3. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
10. Craig D, Byrick R, Carli F: A physician workforce planning model applied to Canadian anesthesiology: planning the future supply of anesthesiologists. Can J Anesth 2002, 49:671–677.
11. Roberfroid D, Leonard C, Stordeur S: Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball? Hum Resour Health 2009, 7:10.
12. Schofield D, McRae I, Shrestha R: Modelling demand for medical services in Australia. In International Medical Workforce Conference. Edinburgh, Scotland; 2008:16–20. http://rcpsc.medical.org/publicpolicy/imwc/ demand_modelling.pdf.
13. Segal L, Bolton T: Issues facing future health care workforce: the importance of demand modelling. Aust New Zeal Health Pol 2009, 6:12.
14. Health Workforce Australia: Health Workforce. Australia: Doctors, Nurses and Midwives – Volume 1. Adelaide: HWA; 2012.
15. Health Workforce Australia: Health Workforce 2025 – Doctors. Australia: Nurses and Midwives – Volume 2. Adelaide: HWA; 2012.
16. Health Workforce Australia: Health Workforce 2025. Australia: Medical Specialties – Volume 3. Adelaide: HWA; 2012.
17. Productivity Commission: Australia's Health Workforce Research Report. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2005.
B. Artikel "How evidence-based workforce planning in Australia is informing policy development in the retention and distribution of the health workforce" sudah disitasi sebanyak 1 kali.
C. Artikel yang mirip pada referensi adalah ada 119 artikel
D. Hipotesis artikel ini adalah Perencanaan tenaga kerja kesehatan di masa datang harus diproyeksikan berdasarkan bukti dasar ketersediaan tenaga kerja saat ini.
ESSA NITA CERIA
Nim. 13/357560/PKU/14132
No comments:
Post a Comment