Sunday, February 13, 2022

Gaslighting Is Not Real

Introduction: what is gaslighting?



Gaslighting is a form of emotional abuse in which a manipulator misleads and confuses their victim, causing them to question their own sense of reality. Gaslighting is most commonly used by abusers in order to have more control over the victim. The abuser will often try to convince the victim that they are being too sensitive or paranoid when they question what's been done to them.



Gaslighting is a form of mental abuse where the victim's sense of reality is threatened by a person, making them question their own thoughts and feelings to the point that they are not sure what is real anymore. Gaslighting often begins with subtle but noticeable changes in normal behaviors or routines. These seemingly small changes may be difficult for the victim at first, but gradually become so abusive that it takes over their life.



Gaslighting is a form of emotional abuse and manipulation that can be dangerous to both psychological and physical wellbeing. The term originates from the 1938 play Gas Light, where the term was used to describe the dimming of gas lights in a house caused by somebody looking for hidden treasure. In this context, it means somebody who psychologically manipulates others into doubting themselves and their judgement, causing them to question their authenticity.



How can you identify gaslighting?



Gaslighting is an extremely manipulative tactic that makes the victim doubt their own perception of reality. Gaslighting can also happen to people who are not victims by accident, but rather by feelings of inadequacy. Gaslighting can present itself in different ways, but it is often done through subtle manipulation, confusing facts or events, and making the victim think they are crazy. It's important to know what to look for so you can identify gaslighting in your life.



Gaslighting is a manipulative tactic that often leaves victims feeling confused, isolated, and ungrounded in their perspective of reality. The abuse can be deliberate or unintentional. Gaslighting usually begins with small actions like occasional comments or the person telling the victim they are wrong about their perception of events to make them feel like they are going crazy.



How does it impact a person's self esteem and social interactions?



Gaslighting is a common form of emotional abuse in which one person, usually in a position of power, tries to manipulate the other person. The abuser constantly pushes the victim's sanity and perception of reality, while convincing them that their thoughts are completely irrational. This kind of manipulation can lead to many side effects on an individual, including low self-esteem and social isolation.



Gaslighting is a form of emotional abuse that can have a significant impact on a person's self esteem and social interactions. Gaslighting occurs when someone is manipulated into believing they are misremembering, misunderstanding, or overreacting to something. A person who has been gaslighted may have an increased sense of self-doubt, undue sensitivity to social cues, and have trouble relating to others.



Conclusion: how do you stop gaslighting?



Gaslighting is a form of emotional abuse that makes it difficult for victims to trust their own memory, perception, and sanity. It's hard to comprehend just how difficult gaslighting can be until you've experienced it firsthand, but there are steps you can take to protect yourself and others from gaslighting.



Gaslighting is a form of emotional abuse that often goes unrecognized by the victim. To stop gaslighting, be aware of your own feelings and what your partner does to make you question them. Take some time for yourself; step away from the situation and try to be objective about it. If you feel like you're being gaslighted, ask a close friend or family member if they see what you're going through.









Sunday, April 24, 2016

TUGAS METODOLODI PENELITIAN

Penelitian Kualitatif  Di Bidang K3

Nama : Zuzun Nazila
NIM   : 15/388267/PKU/15489
Minat : K3  2015

Dengan hormat
Dr. dr. Mubasyyir Hasanbasri, MA

1. Topik Penelitian
    Kekerasan dalam rumah tangga dan pekerjaan

2. Fokus Penelitian
    Bagaimana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga dan pekerjaan dapat mempengaruhi                 kinerja perempuan dan menurunkan prestasi kerja perempuan

3. Variabel Penelitian
    Variabel Independen : Kekerasan dalam rumah tangga dan pekerjaan
    Variabel Dependen   : Kinerja perempuan

4. Metode PenelitianYang Bisa Ditiru
  • Pemilihan pekerja yang dijadikan sampel mewakili daerah yang tinggal di   pedesaan dan perkotaan
  • Sampel yang diambil adalah pekerja wanita yang memiliki pengalaman bekerja selama 2 tahun terakhir yang secara bersamaan mengalami           kekerasan baik secara fisik dan emosional dari pasangan hidup maupun ditempat kerja
  • Peneliti memilih sampel dari latar belakang pekerjaan yang berbeda beda seperti kasir, pelayan, resepsionis, pekerja pabrik, petugas motel, dll.
5. Metode Penelitian Yang Tidak Bisa Ditiru
  • Lokasi pemilihan responden tertalu luas, bisa difokuskan pada suatu tempat misalnya pada suatu daerah atau perusahaan tertentu
  • Kesulitan untuk mendapatkan informasi/data dari responden karena data yang diinginkan bersifat personal.
6. REFERENSI 
  1. Alameddine, M., Kazzi, A., El-Jardali, F., Dimassi, H., & Maalouf, S. (2011).     Occupational violence at Lebanese emergency departments: prevalence, characteristics and associated factors. Journal of occupational health, 53(6), 455-464.
  2. Chen, W. C., Hwu, H. G., Kung, S. M., Chiu, H. J., & Wang, J. D. (2008). Prevalence and determinants of workplace violence of health care workers in a psychiatric hospital in Taiwan. Journal of Occupational Health, 50(3), 288-293.
  3. Lee, H. E., Kim, H. R., & Park, J. S. (2014). Work-related risk factors for workplace violence among Korean employees. Journal of occupational health, 56(1), 12-20.
  4. Pien, L. C., Chen, D. R., Chen, C. J., Liang, K. M., & Cheng, Y. (2015). Associations of neighborhood-level workplace violence with workers' mental distress problems: a multilevel analysis of Taiwanese employees. Journal of occupational health, 57(6), 555-564.
  5. Rogers, K. A., & Kelloway, E. K. (1997). Violence at work: personal and organizational outcomes. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2(1), 63.
  6. Rothman, E. F., Hathaway, J., Stidsen, A., & de Vries, H. F. (2007). How employment helps female victims of intimate partner violence: a qualitative study. Journal of occupational health psychology, 12(2), 136.
  7. Swanberg, J. E., & Logan, T. K. (2005). Domestic violence and employment: a qualitative study. Journal of occupational health psychology, 10(1), 3.
  8. Wathen, C. N., MacGregor, J. C., & MacQuarrie, B. J. (2015). The impact of domestic violence in the workplace: results from a Pan-Canadian survey.Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 57(7), e65.

Tuesday, April 19, 2016

TUGAS METODOLOGI PENELITIAN

TUGAS METODOLOGI PENELITIAN

(Penelitian Kualitatif Di Bidang K3)

 

Nama : Rina Aprianti

NIM     : 15/388209/PKU/15431

Minat  : K3 UGM 2015

 

A.   Topik Penelitian

Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi terjadinya stres kerja

 

B.   Fokus Penelitian

Mengapa stres kerja bisa terjadi?

 

C.   Variabel Penelitian

Variabel Independent   : Hubungan pasien dengan perawat.

Variabel Dependent      : Stres Kerja

 

D.   Motode Penelitian

Dari jurnal referensi tentang "Long-Term Stress, Burnout And Patient–Nurse Relations: Qualitative Interview Study About Nurses' Experiences " oleh Billeter‐Koponen, Sirkka, and Lars Fredén. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 19.1 (2005): 20-27.

 

1.    Metode Penelitian Yang Bisa Ditiru

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan pemahaman yang lebih mendalam tentang bagaimana perawat mengalami stres, dan menggali informasi lebih mendalam mengenai hubungan pasien-perawat dengan wawancara terbuka. Sampel yang di ambil adalah perawat yang sudah lama bekerja, karena mereka telah mengalami stres jangka panjang dan kelelahan.

 

2.    Metode Penelitian Yang Tidak Bisa Ditiru

Penelitian ini mengambil responden dari institusi perawatan yang berbeda, hal ini tidak bisa ditiru karena beban kerjanya untuk masing-masing institusi mungkin tidak sama terutama untuk lokasi penelitian yang berbeda. Sampel yang di ambil dalam penelitian ini adalah perawat dengan umur 30-61 tahun, untuk rencana penelitian yang akan saya lakukan nanti patokan umur tersebut tidak dapat saya pakai karena harus disesuaikan dengan kondisi jumlah umur perawat di lokasi penelitian, mungkin akan menggunakan masa kerja dari perawat tersebut.

 

E.   Referensi:

1.    Billeter‐Koponen, Sirkka, and Lars Fredén. "Long‐term stress, burnout and patient–nurse relations: qualitative interview study about nurses' experiences."Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 19.1 (2005): 20-27.

2.    Ablett, Janice R., and R. S. P. Jones. "Resilience and well‐being in palliative care staff: a qualitative study of hospice nurses' experience of work." Psycho‐Oncology 16.8 (2007): 733-740.

3.    Reid, Y., et al. "Explanations for stress and satisfaction in mental health professionals: a qualitative study." Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology 34.6 (1999): 301-308.

4.    Weishaar, Heide B. "Consequences of international migration: A qualitative study on stress among Polish migrant workers in Scotland." Public health122.11 (2008): 1250-1256.

5.    Weatherly, Kristopher A., and David A. Tansik. "Tactics used by customer-contact workers: Effects of role stress, boundary spanning and control."International Journal of Service Industry Management 4.3 (1993): 0-0.

6.    Mazzola, Joseph J., Irvin Sam Schonfeld, and Paul E. Spector. "What qualitative research has taught us about occupational stress." Stress and Health 27.2 (2011): 93-110.

7.    Conti, Robert, et al. "The effects of lean production on worker job stress."International journal of operations & production management 26.9 (2006): 1013-1038.

8.    Kirsh, Bonnie. "Work, workers, and workplaces: A qualitative analysis of narratives of mental health consumers." Journal of Rehabilitation 66.4 (2000): 24

METODOLOGI PENELITIAN : PENELITIAN KUALITATIF TERKAIT KESELAMATAN DAN KESEHATAN KERJA (K3)

RIAN UTHAMI K3 2015 (NIM. 15/388206/PKU/15428)

A.      TOPIK PENELITIAN
Topik penelitian yang dipilih adalah : LOW BACK PAIN pada Perawat
 
B.      FOKUS PENELITIAN
Fokus Penelitian adalah Bagaimana persepsi risiko terjadinya Low Back Pain pada Perawat
 
C.      METODE PENGUMPULAN DATA
Jurnal utama adalah : Risk Perception of Nonspecific Low Back Pain among Nurses: A Qualitative Approach
 
1.      VARIABEL PENELITIAN
a.       Variabel independen : Persepsi risiko
b.      Variabel dependen : Low Back Pain
 
2.      METODE YANG BISA DITIRU
a.      Metode pengumpulan data yang bisa ditiru adalah teknik pengambilan sampel dengan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling dengan ukuran sampel ditentukan berdasarkan tingkat kejenuhan data, yaitu sampel dianggap cukup bila informasi yang dibutuhkan sudah didapatkan atau diperoleh.
b.      Pemahaman persepsi perawat tentang konsekuensi LBP penting sebelum menerapkan program intervensi untuk menurunkan skala masalah. Teori yang diusulkan sebagai panduan wawancara yaitu The Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) adalah salah satu teori banyak digunakan untuk menjelaskan pola perilaku berdasarkan tingkat keparahan dan kerentanan yang dirasakan.
c.       Software analisis data menggunakan MAXQDA 10 versi 10
 
3.      METODE YANG TIDAK BISA DITIRU
a.      Wawancara dilakukan antara September – Oktober 2012 sampai Februari - Maret 2013. Waktu penelitian cukup lama sekitar 5 – 6 bulan. Hal ini membutuhkan banyak waktu, tenaga dan biaya.
b.      Kriteria inklusinya yaitu perawat yang memiliki setidaknya 1 tahun pengalaman kerja di bidang keperawatan dengan pendidikan terakhir S1 dan S2 sederajat. Akan lebih sulit menemukan perawat dengan pendidikan terakhir S2 Keperawatan pada tempat  atau lokasi penelitian yang saya pilih.
 
D.     REFERENSI
1.      Abedini, S., Morowatisharifabad, M. A., Enjezab, B., Barkhordari, A., & Fallahzadeh, H. (2014). Risk Perception of Nonspecific Low Back Pain among Nurses: A Qualitative Approach. Health Promotion Perspectives, 4(2), 221–229. http://doi.org/10.5681/hpp.2014.029, Diakses dari : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4300449/pdf/hpp-4-221.pdf.
2.      Ovayolu, O., Ovayolu, N., Genc, M., & Col-Araz, N. (2014). Frequency and Severity of Low Back Pain in Nurses Working in Intensive Care Units and Influential Factors. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 30(1), 70–76. http://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.301.3455
3.      Tan, B.-K., Smith, A. J., O'Sullivan, P. B., Chen, G., Burnett, A. F., & Briggs, A. M. (2014). Low back pain beliefs are associated to age, location of work, education and pain-related disability in Chinese healthcare professionals working in China: a cross sectional survey. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 15, 255. http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-255
4.      Rezaee, M., & Ghasemi, M. (2014). Prevalence of Low Back Pain Among Nurses: Predisposing Factors and Role of Work Place Violence. Trauma Monthly, 19(4), e17926. http://doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.17926
5.      Rasmussen, C. D. N., Holtermann, A., Mortensen, O. S., Søgaard, K., & Jørgensen, M. B. (2013). Prevention of low back pain and its consequences among nurses' aides in elderly care: a stepped-wedge multi-faceted cluster-randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 13, 1088. http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1088
6.      Cilliers, L., & Maart, S. (2013). Attitudes, knowledge and treatment of low back pain amongst nurses in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine, 5(1), 535. http://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v5i1.535
7.      Smedley, J., Egger, P., Cooper, C., & Coggon, D. (1997). Prospective cohort study of predictors of incident low back pain in nurses. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 314(7089), 1225–1228.
8.      Maul, I., Laubli, T., Klipstein, A., & Krueger, H. (2003). Course of low back pain among nurses: a longitudinal study across eight years. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60(7), 497–503. http://doi.org/10.1136/oem.60.7.497

Tugas Jurnal Kualitatif : Budi Sulistiyo Nugroho K3 2015

Dengan hormat
Dr. dr. Mubasyyir Hasanbasri, MA

1.    Topik yang diambil :

Behavioural Based Safety (BBS) in Industry

2.    Fokus riset :

Mengapa dibutuhkan BBS dalam dunia industri ?

3.    Kata kunci :

safety (improvement, education, instruction, training), implementation steps, employee (young adults and young workers), risk management, feedback and steering committee, organizational behavior management, applied behavior analysis, observation

4.    Variabel Penelitian :

a.    Variabel independen : Behavioural Based Safety (BBS) approach

b.    Variabel dependen : Unsafe and Safe Behavior Employee

5.    Metode yang bisa ditiru :

Metode mix method yaitu kuantitatif dan kualitatif dengan melakukan wawancara semi terstruktur pada sampel yaitu pekerja yang menduduki jabatan manajerial seperti Safety and Health Manager, BBS Facilitator, Safety and Health Officer/Supervisor, Project Manager and Project Engineer dan dengan menggunakan kuesioner yang dibagi di lapangan, sehingga dengan teknik sampling secara proporsional tersebut informasi yang diperoleh melalui wawancara dapat lebih mewakili kondisi nyata dari lingkungan penelitian karena berasal dari sumber dengan karakteristik yang berbeda dengan mengadakan feedback and steering committee untuk melakukan CARE (Corrective Action Request for Evaluation)

6.    Metode yang tidak bisa ditiru :

Saya akan mengalami kesulitan untuk meneliti responden dari sektor industri yang berisiko tinggi terhadap bahaya karena BBS (Behavioural Based Safety) sudah berkembang menjadi RBBS (Risk Based Behavior Safety) dengan metode baru yaitu the QUAN-qual method dengan melakukan pre-test post-test non-equivalent control group design karena memerlukan waktu yang lama dan biaya yang tidak sedikit. Membutuhkan waktu lama karena harus ada observasi terlebih dahulu sebelum dan sesudah pekerja mendapatkan training dan drill tentang BBS kemudian melakukan pre-test post-test non-equivalent control group design, selain itu juga membutuhkan biaya yang tidak sedikit.

7.    Referensi: 

a.    Steps for the Behavioural Based Safety: A Case Study Approach, Faridah Ismail and Ahmad Ezanee Hashim, Member, IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 5, October 2012

b.        Integration of Behaviour-Based Safety Programme into Engineering       Laboratories and Workshops Conceptually, Kean Eng Koo, School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, International Education Studies Vol. 5, No. 2; April 2012, Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education

c.    Behaviour- Based Safety: A Case Study Illustrating A Successful Approach, Julia Clancy, Qest Consulting Group

d.   Behavior-Based Safety and Occupational Risk Management, E. Scott Geller, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Behavior Modification, Vol. 29 No. 3, May 2005 539-561, DOI: 10.1177/0145445504273287

e.    Behaviour Based Safety in Organizations, H.L. Kaila, Universitas Mumbay, India, Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, December 2006 Vol 10



Salam,
Budi Sulistiyo Nugroho | Academic Evaluation-HSE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kementerian ESDM - STEM Akamigas
Jl Gajah Mada No. 38 Cepu,
T +62 296 421897 ext. 178
F +62 296 425939

Esok adalah hadiah untuk bekerja dengan aman hari ini, keselamatan adalah gerbang kesuksesan karena keselamatan dan kesuksesan tidak dapat dipisahkan